NIGERIA MEDIA MONITOR

{------


#03-24 June 22, 1998


*	CHRIS ANYANWU RELEASED
*	GROUPS QUESTION SELECTIVE RELEASE OF DETAINEES
*	GOVT URGED TO ABROGATE ANTI-PRESS LAWS
*	REGULATORY FOUNDATIONS FOR TELECOMM IN NIGERIA
*	GUERRILLA JOURNALISM IN NIGERIA

NEWSREEL

CHRIS ANYANWU RELEASED
Imprisoned publisher and editor-in-chief of The Sunday Magazine (TSM),
Christine Anyanwu, has been released.

A government statement issued on June 15, said new military Head of State,
Gen. Abdulsalam Abubakar had approved unconditional amnesty for Anyanwu on
health grounds.

She was released along with former head of state, General Olusegun
Obasanjo, deposed Sultan of Sokoto, Alhaji Ibrahim Dasuki; former Oyo
State governor, Chief Bola Ige; former Secretary General of the National
Union of Petroleum and Natural Workers (NUPENG), Frank Kokori; and former
president of the Petroleum and National Senior Staff Association
(PENGASSAN), Chief Milton Dabibi.  Also released were medical doctor and
rights activist, Dr. Beko Ransome-Kuti, defunct Social Democratic Party
(SDP), presidential aspirant, Chief Olabiyi Durojaiye and Nwen Udah.

Anyanwu's release was effected by the prison authorities in Kaduna on June
17. She arrived Lagos the same day.

In July 1995, a special military tribunal secretly tried Anyanwu with 3
other journalists and sentenced them to life imprisonment for "accessory
after the fact of treason" The sentences were commuted to fifteen years in
prison by the Gen. Abacha-led Provisional Ruling Council.

She was kept in Gombe Prison, north-eastern Nigeria, from where she was
transferred to the Kaduna prison.

The amnesty announced for Anyanwu and the eight others said nothing about
other journalists in various prisons and detention camps across the
country.

Prominent among them are Kunle Ajibade (The News/TEMPO), Ben-Charles Obi
(Classique), and George Mbah (TELL).

Others are Bagauda Kaltho, Femi Ojudu, Tokunbo Fakeye, Rafiu Salau, and
Moshood Fayemiwo.

GROUPS QUESTION SELECTIVE RELEASE OF DETAINEES
Pro-democracy and human rights groups have criticised what they described
as the "selective release" of nine persons out of the over 150 being held
by security agents nationwide.

A statement by the Campaign for Democracy (CD) said the "selective
approach to the release of political prisoners is aimed at fostering an
illusion of freedom".

Although it welcomed the release of its chairman, Dr. Beko Ransome-Kuti,
the statement insisted that "nothing short of a general amnesty for all
political prisoners including Chief M.K.O Abiola, winner of the June 12,
1993 presidential election, will do".

The Committee for the Defence of Human Rights (CDHR) said "the number
released was far short of the 156 currently languishing unjustifiably in
various detention centres and prisons in the country".

The National Association of Nigeria Students (NANS) asked for adequate
compensation for the detainees. It also called for the release of Chief
M.K.O Abiola and the others.

The Nigerian Bar Association (Lagos branch) asked the head of state to
release Abiola and enter into a meaningful dialogue with him".

It also demanded amnesty for General Oladipo Diya, Col. Lawan Gwadabe and
others convicted in 1995 and 1998 by Special Military Tribunals (SMT) for
allegedly plotting to overthrow the government of late General Sani
Abacha.

GOVT URGED TO ABROGATE ANTI-PRESS DECREES
The Federal Government has been called upon to abrogate all decrees
impeding the effective performance of journalists in the discharge of
their duties.

Participants at a one-day sensitization workshop of the National
Association of Woman Journalists (NAWOJ), resolved that government needed
to encouraged a free press in Nigeria by abrogating such decrees.

In a seven-point communique issued at the end of the workshop, the
participants said the journalists be adequately remunerated so that they
could play their roles of informing women on active participation in
politics.

The workshop also canvassed for the establishment of a proper machinery to
educate the people against political violence which "is a cankerworm that
has eaten deep into the fabrics of our political life".


REGULATORY FOUNDATIONS FOR TELECOMM IN NIGERIA (2)
It is interesting to note that although Nigeria did not fully take part in
this important negotiation as part of the GATS/NGBT negotiating process,
the underlying goals and the existing rudimentary regulatory framework
enshrined in the Act substantially conforms with the cardinal principles
generally, adopted in the text of the WTO Negotiations by the NGBT. With
the emergence of Liberalistion and  competition firmly established as the
testament of the new multi-latral trading system, telecomunications  is
bound to reap the benefits of enhanced development both in network  and
service provision. The Nigeria Telecommunications sector have responded
positively to this development by the gradual process of deregulation of
its telecommunications industry. Deregulation does not means absence of
regulation at all. It only provides the rules of the game and ensures
fairness by all competitors. However, real deregulation can be seen when
regulators focus more on consumer issues and leave market forces to take
care of most inter-operator issues. With the removal of monopoly of NITEL,
the commissions is expected to step up its regulatory role with a view of
not merely ensuring competition, but more importantly, ensuring systems
efficiency and the prevention of anti-competitive practices in the
industry.

There is no doubt that commission as the institutional regulator will
assume more prominet role in the ensuing dispensation which machinery have
already being set in motion. The global trends in the direction of
liberalisation and competition makes it  a necessity for Nigeria to fully
integrate as a player in the world  and also the regional markets. >From
the Africa development perspective, African countries have been enjoined
to join forces "at the continental and sub-regional levels so as to
promote the greatest extent possible the integration of their network and
services and hence of their economies." This initiative in The African
Green Paper, though with no binding force, achieves the desired objective
of promoting regional awareness for integration and the endorsement of
specific imperatives for development such as movement of public sector
activity from ownership to policy making and regulation, private sector
participation and market-oriented operation, and the introduction of
competition into service provision. Although, this effort emanates from
ITU in collaboration with some African administrations and organisations;
it complements the entire WTO initiatives. on the whole, there is no doubt
that the WTO protocols have engendered significant African consciousness
on the potentialities of its telecommunication capacities and market and
have created the forum through the GATS/NGBT process to participate in the
ongoing global changes. This provides more than enough ground for
intensified action in the Nigerian scene in order to catch up with the
pace of development in other African countries like Ghana, Coted 'Ivorie
and South Africa who has introduced liberalisation of telecommunications
clearly behind Nigeria.

It is submitted from the foregoing analysis of developments that Nigeria,
within a period of a decade (1985 - 1993) has progressively achieved at
least five basic initiatives consistent with the evolution of a viable and
deregulated telecommunications environment.
*a formal separation of telecommunications from the old P&T operations
(starting with NET and now NITEL as an independent entity).
*commercialisation of NITEL.
*establishment of an independent regulatory body, the Nigerian
Communications Commission (NCC);
*introduction of competition and diversity in service by licensing
operators and prospective carriers (demonopolisation of NITEL).
.Privitisation of NITEL as a progressive step towards liberalisation,
enhanced private sector participation and investment, and systems
effeciency in telecommunications in Nigeria.

These are part of the materials for laying a solid foundation from which
future reforms and developments can legitimately take place.  With more
than a  basic and rudimentary telecommunications law in the Act, there is
still a basis for legislative and regulatory reform generally and as it
affect some of the fundamental objectives for setting up of the commission
under the Act.
With the operation of NITEL in an inchoate state of demopolisation
through interconnecting agreements and libralising initiatives, the path
to enhanced competition and market efficiency in the Nigerian
telecommunication sector is clearly evolving.  This is particularly so
having established earlieir in this paper that there is indeed no legal
basis for NITEL's continued monopoly since the Act came into force and
that NITEL ought to be subject to the regulatory powers of the commission.
There is also the need for specific amendments to further ensure
compatibility of our laws with the WTO/GATT specific initiatives on basic
telecommunications and the commitments reached in the NGBT negotiations.
The commission, in pursuance of its statutory function of managing
Nigeria's input in thet provision of international standard for
telecommunications should take more active part in the WTO/FATT protocols
on telecommunictions.
The independence and autonomy of the commission cannot be overemphasised,
particularly in view of the complexities of the policies and economics of
telecommunication in the context of the Nigerian environment.  It needs to
be insulated from government dominance both in ownership and control.
Nigeria and other developing countries can no longer afford to leave
telecommunications to civil service administration as public sector can no
longer manage alone the change required to meet to the challenges of
network expansion and consumer demand.
However, there is today no sound basis in the argument that the
traditional role  of government in providing essential utilities such as
water, road, energy including  telecommunications services dictate the
need to control or own the  means of providing them.  This thinking only
provides a model for government monopoly with the attendant restricted
market access and other barriers to trade.  
The conntemporary and radical shift in many jurisdictions has been to
create environment for these utilities to be efficiently deployed and
profitably owned.  The view taken here is that as essential utilities,
government's responsibility to ensure their effective and efficient
provision does not necessarily approximate to their owning or controlling
them, rather, it should  create a conducive and regulatory environment for
their provision and conduct.  Hence, the government assumes the role of
the regulator.  This regulatory role has extended to virtually every
sector like the financial insitutions,  education, and energy  including
tourism.  The privatisation of NITEL with the retention of 40 per cent
equity, though many have conceptually satisfied the IMF recognised
standard (50 per cent) for government participation, at best it merely
depicts a picture of psudo-privatisation in the Nigerian context. 
A more significant reduction in government's ownership and control to say
15 per cent or less would effectively and meaningfully open up enterprise
to full benefits of increased public and consumer confidence which would
in turn engender increased pivate sector investment, competition and the
desired  market efficiency, coupled with a conducive regulatory
environment provided by the commission.  Telecommunications development is
an indispensable agent in dynamic process of economic growth and in the
emerging world order.  Our participation and integration in this order is
equally a national imperative notwithstanding the intractable problems of
deployment of resources and organisation of the environment,  The
phenomena of competition and liberalisation are the acceptable means or
process of achieving the desired goal, they are not the ends themselves.
These processes are already taking place and must be kept on course.
Concluded. The first part of this article was published in the last
edition.

Adewopo is of Department of Business Law, Faculty of Law, Lagos State
University (LASU), Lagos,  as well as a partner, Laoye & Adewopo, a firm
of legal consultants.    

GUERRILLA JOURNALISM IN NIGERIA
by Sunday Dare.
As you read this, armed Nigerian military officers have sealed off the
administrative offices of TheNews/TEMPO/PMNews group, for which I work.
They have carted away all the computers, printers and scanners and have
arrested seven staff members. Soon I will slip back across the border of
my motherland and, with my colleagues, attempt to keep alive one of the
few journalistic enterprises trying to tell the truth about political
events in Nigeria.

Fifteen years ago, no one thought things would get this bad. In the
previous decade petrodollars had poured into Nigeria, Africa's most
populous country, and all sectors of its economy had been rapidly
developing. For the greater part of this period the government of Gen.
Yakubu Gowon was in power, but the Nigerian press nevertheless enjoyed
considerable, though not absolute, freedom. During the eighties, however,
things began to change under decrees giving new powers to the military,
which has ruled Nigeria for all but brief periods since the country gained
its independence in 1960. Several journalists were arrested on trumped-up
charges and handed long jail terms. And by the late eighties, when I began
my journalism career, Nigerians who earlier had seen members of the
military as messiahs began to perceive them as being worse than the
civilian rulers.

In 1992 things came to a head as the press took on Gen. Ibrahim Babangida,
then Nigeria's military ruler, and exposed his secret plan to hang on to
power by every conceivable means. Proscriptions, arrests, death threats,
burning of newspaper offices and seizures of magazines became norm. As a
correspondent of TheNews/TEMPO magazines - PM News, a newspaper, had not
yet been started at that time - I was in the centre of the heat.  In a
vindictive move, Babangida removed his defense minister, Gen. Domkat Bali,
then the longest-serving general in the Nigerian Army.  Unwilling to be so
disgraced, Bali resigned his commission and withdrew from the military
government. As the correspondent based in the Middle Belt, the
geographical region from which Bali hails, I was assigned to seek him out
for an interview. An insider, General Bali not only confirmed Babangida's
political agenda but also predicted that if Babangida refused to hand over
power to a democratically elected government, a coup d'etat would remove
him.

The second day after the published interview hit the newsstands, a
combined team of the state security service and the police stormed our
corporate headquarters in central Lagos, tore down office doors, broke
into the newsroom and impounded every available copy of that edition. On
the street, agents and vendors were harassed and their copies seized. I
melted into the underground, along with my editors, to escape arrest. Less
than two months later, The News was banned and its editors were declared
wanted by the government. Currently, sixteen editors and reporters of the
magazine and its sister publications remain in detention without trial,
while The News's senior correspondent, Bagauda Kaltho, has been missing
for three years with no trace.

For me, there have been many close brushes with arrest.  Last September,
security agents of Gen. Sani Abacha, Nigeria's current military ruler,
stormed our office because of that week's cover story on the panic
generated by Abacha's ill health. While they tried to force their way
through the gates, the editor and I took flight, some into the lavatory
and some onto the rooftop or inside the office wardrobes. Others headed
for the high fence separating our building from the next one, for a
dangerous climb to safety. Paralyzed with fear, I prayed and asked for
divine intervention. I made for the fence and escaped.

Out of this consistent pattern of persecution has come a form of
publishing we call guerrilla journalism. Under guerilla journalism,
unconventional means of news gathering and conducting editorial meetings
have been adopted. The idea of the static editorial setting is forgotten.
Watch carefully - in the stadiums, theaters, taxicabs, bars, restaurants
an hotel lobbies, the groups of four or five casually dressed people that
you see are the new breed of guerrilla journalists, debating story ideas
and deciding the contents of what might turn out to be the next explosive
edition. They are constantly on the move, to keep ahead of the security
agents. Most of us now move around, sleeping and holding meetings in
designated hideouts. Our homes are no-go areas, because of the fear of
being abducted at ungodly hours. Most of the time we make do with sleeping
on rugs, tables and rows of chairs. Practicing journalism the guerrilla
way means wearing ragamuffin or casual dress and carrying a small backpack
containing essentials just in case the need arises to run for cover in the
course of duty or one receives an invitation for a chat with the security
agents, from which one is never sure of returning. Social life is
restricted and circle of friends very tight. Constant alertness is the
rule.

Also, as part of guerrilla journalism, the production schedule has been
reduced from the normal six days to three, with most of the editing work
done in a mobile way-moving from one hideout to another and dropping off
materials at different points. Production is largely clandestine. This
strategy, though highly effective, is risky and tedious, and it raises
costs. Circulation presents the toughest task. Several times, rather than
send parcels by air to our distributors, we opted for private and
commercial vehicles, which usually have to travel as much as ten hours
under cover of night to make deliveries to agents and vendors in the
outlying areas. For about ten weeks, at one point, editors and reporters
distinguished as circulation men and vendors took to the streets on foot
and motorcycle because the licensed agents and vendors had been harassed
and warned not to sell our magazines.

Four months ago I took a respite from this struggle. Now it is time for me
to rejoin a respite from this struggle. Now it is time for me to rejoin
the effort to advance the cause of democratic government, a cause to which
my colleagues and I are irrevocably committed.

* Dare, General Editor of The News * TEMPO magazines, first contributed
this piece to The Nation magazine in New York, U.S. A.



TO OUR DEAR READERS: Media Monitor is a dialogical project. We expect that its contents will elicit reactions from its readers. Consequently, you are all encouraged to share your feelings with one another on its pages. Letters not longer than 200 words marked for the attention of the Editor, Media Monitor, should be e-mailed to: ijc@linkserve.com.ng

MEDIA MONITOR IS PUBLISHED WEEKLY AND CIRCULATED WORLDWIDE BY INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM CENTRE (IJC), TEJUMOLA HOUSE, 1ST FLOOR, 24 OMOLE LAYOUT, NEW ISHERI ROAD, P.O.BOX 7808, LAGOS, NIGERIA. TEL/FAX 234-1-4924998; E-MAIL: ijc@linkserve.com.ng


Media Monitor